When it comes to selecting the ideal roofing material for your property in Malaysia, cost is a critical factor. Whether you’re planning for a residential home, commercial building, or industrial facility, you want a roofing solution that offers value for money without compromising on performance. Aluminium Composite Panel (ACP) roofing has emerged as a popular option due to its blend of affordability, modern aesthetics, and long-term benefits. But how does it stack up against other roofing materials in terms of cost?
In this article, we’ll break down the cost comparison between ACP roofing and other popular roofing materials in Malaysia, such as clay tiles, concrete tiles, metal sheets, asphalt shingles, and polycarbonate sheets.
Understanding ACP Roofing
Aluminium Composite Panels (ACP) consist of two aluminium sheets bonded to a non-aluminium core. These panels are lightweight, durable, and weather-resistant—making them ideal for Malaysia’s tropical climate. ACP roofing offers excellent UV protection, modern appearance, and low maintenance costs, making it increasingly attractive for architects and developers alike.
The initial cost of ACP roofing varies depending on thickness, brand, and installation complexity, but it typically ranges from RM25 to RM60 per square foot. While not the cheapest option upfront, the long-term value and minimal upkeep requirements help balance the investment.
ACP Roofing vs Clay Roof Tiles
Clay tiles are a traditional roofing material known for their durability and rustic charm. In Malaysia, clay tiles cost between RM15 and RM40 per square foot. On the surface, this may appear more affordable than ACP roofing.
However, clay tiles are heavier, which increases structural costs, and they require regular maintenance to avoid moss buildup, cracking, or breakage due to heavy rain and temperature fluctuations. They may also fade over time, affecting their visual appeal.
Cost comparison takeaway: While clay tiles are cheaper initially, ACP roofing offers better longevity and lower upkeep costs.
ACP Roofing vs Concrete Roof Tiles
Concrete tiles are slightly more affordable than clay tiles, with prices ranging from RM12 to RM30 per square foot. They are durable and provide good insulation, but their heavyweight nature requires reinforced roof structures. Over time, concrete tiles may become porous, leading to water absorption and potential roof leaks.
In contrast, ACP roofing is lightweight and doesn’t require additional reinforcement, cutting down on structural expenses. Moreover, ACP panels are pre-finished and resistant to moisture, reducing the chance of leaks.
Cost comparison takeaway: Concrete tiles may win on price per square foot, but ACP roofing is easier to install, reducing labour and structural support costs.
ACP Roofing vs Metal Roofing Sheets
Metal roofing sheets, particularly zinc or galvanised iron, are one of the most common options in Malaysia due to their affordability and availability. They typically cost around RM10 to RM25 per square foot. While economical, metal roofs are prone to rust, corrosion, and noise issues during heavy rain—an important consideration in Malaysia’s monsoon seasons.
ACP panels, although more expensive than basic metal sheets, come with protective coatings that enhance resistance to rust, UV rays, and sound transmission. Additionally, ACP roofing offers better thermal insulation, helping reduce energy bills in the long term.
Cost comparison takeaway: For projects prioritising modern looks and thermal control, ACP is a better long-term investment despite the higher initial cost.
ACP Roofing vs Asphalt Shingles
Asphalt shingles are not as popular in Malaysia but are occasionally used in residential buildings. They cost approximately RM18 to RM40 per square foot. While they provide a pleasant aesthetic and decent insulation, they are not well-suited to Malaysia’s high humidity and heavy rainfall. Shingles may crack or warp under extreme heat and moisture.
ACP roofing, being more robust and resistant to tropical weather conditions, proves more durable and efficient. With fewer repairs needed over time, the total cost of ownership for ACP panels is lower.
Cost comparison takeaway: ACP roofing offers superior weather resistance and durability, making it more suitable for the Malaysian climate.
ACP Roofing vs Polycarbonate Sheets
Polycarbonate roofing sheets are often used for patios, awnings, and skylights due to their transparency and lightweight properties. Their cost ranges from RM10 to RM30 per square foot. Although economical, polycarbonate sheets are not ideal for full-scale roofing due to their low resistance to heat and UV degradation over time.
In contrast, ACP roofing provides better overall protection, energy efficiency, and lifespan for residential and commercial structures. It also maintains its aesthetic appeal for many years without yellowing or warping.
Cost comparison takeaway: Polycarbonate is best for specific applications, while ACP offers a more comprehensive roofing solution.
Long-Term Cost Benefits of ACP Roofing
While the initial cost of ACP roofing may be higher than some traditional materials, the total life cycle cost is often lower. Here’s why:
- Low maintenance: No regular repainting, sealing, or major repairs required.
- Energy efficiency: Reflective surfaces help reduce indoor temperatures, lowering cooling costs.
- Longevity: ACP panels can last 20–30 years or more with minimal degradation.
- Aesthetic value: Maintains modern and clean appearance over time, adding to property value.
Final Verdict
ACP roofing in Malaysia may not always be the cheapest option at the outset, but its durability, weather resistance, low maintenance, and modern design make it a smart investment for long-term savings and building value. When comparing it to materials like clay tiles, concrete tiles, or metal sheets, ACP roofing strikes a balance between performance and cost efficiency—especially for property owners looking for a sleek, reliable, and modern roofing solution.
If you’re planning your next roofing project, considering ACP roofing could help you save more over the roof’s lifetime—both in money and maintenance headaches.